 |
|
| FREE NEWS SERVICES • Newsletters • RSS feeds • Alerts |
CAREERWEB • Register • Post your CV • Find your job |
BRAINSTORM
• Subscribe • Read online |
iWEEK • Subscribe • Read online • Get into iWeek |
IT TRAINING • TrainingWeb ITWEB EVENTS • Events Calendar |
FEEDBACK
• Post your feedback • Send us a news tip |
 |
 |
|
Sponsor's
Message
28 May 2007
DA walks out of censorship Bill hearings
BY
LEON ENGELBRECHT
, ITWEB SENIOR WRITER
READ IN THIS STORY:
[
Johannesburg, 28 May 2007
] -
Two Democratic Alliance (DA) MPs have walked out of a meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs to protest the debate of a censorship Bill they say is “clearly unconstitutional”.
“Myself and the DA deputy spokesman on home affairs, Marius Swart MP, walked out of a meeting due to our objections to the unconstitutional Film and Publications Bill,” says MP Sandy Kalyan.
“The proposed Bill, as well as the proposed ANC amendments, are open to constitutional challenge and we, therefore, find it a futile exercise to continue a clause-by-clause discussion of the Bill,” she adds. “Regrettably, the Bill in its current form fails to achieve the purpose for which it was ostensibly drafted.”
Kalyan, in a statement, gave a number of reasons why the Bill would be unconstitutional if enacted. Most are technical in content. They include that the draft law would retain publication censorship, and that restoring the exemption for newspapers and broadcasters from having to seek pre-publication approval for material including violence or sexual content does not remedy the situation.
Other amendments duplicate existing provisions in other laws, such as the Equality Act; place the adjudication of freedom of expression issues before an administrative tribunal staffed with bureaucrats, rather than the courts; or encroach on the authority of the Independent Communications Authority of SA.
Acrimonious hearings
The walkout follows acrimonious hearings earlier this month, during which the media decried the Bill for seeking to introduce a censorship regime “not even the apartheid government dared to enforce”.
Among the parties making submissions were the Internet Service Providers Association, the Wireless Application Service Providers Association and the National Association of Broadcasters.
Swart, at the time, said the Bill “as far as I am concerned, is fraught with difficulty and is unconstitutional in many respects”. He added that the objectives of the Bill, to clamp down on visual images of child abuse and to keep porn out of the hands of children, are laudable, “but we are going about it the wrong way”. Swart said self-regulation remained preferable.
Freedom of Expression Institute spokesman Naeem Jeenah says he regrets the DA's walkout. “This is an important battle that needs to be fought at the level of the Parliamentary Committee and it is a pity the DA withdrew. That leaves it to civil society to convince the rest of the committee that the Bill is unconstitutional.
“For us, the lobbying around the Bill continues,” Jeenah says. “We will continue to lobby Parliament not to enact the Bill. If they do, we will lobby the president [Thabo Mbeki] not to sign it into law. If he signs, we – with other organisations – will lead a constitutional challenge against it. We hope it won't come to that.”
Related stories:
Global online censorship rising fast
Censorship Bill back to drafters?
Media cries foul at proposed Bill
China to rein in bloggers
Experts find path round Internet firewalls
Big Brother laws threaten World Cup
“Myself and the DA deputy spokesman on home affairs, Marius Swart MP, walked out of a meeting due to our objections to the unconstitutional Film and Publications Bill,” says MP Sandy Kalyan.
“The proposed Bill, as well as the proposed ANC amendments, are open to constitutional challenge and we, therefore, find it a futile exercise to continue a clause-by-clause discussion of the Bill,” she adds. “Regrettably, the Bill in its current form fails to achieve the purpose for which it was ostensibly drafted.”
Kalyan, in a statement, gave a number of reasons why the Bill would be unconstitutional if enacted. Most are technical in content. They include that the draft law would retain publication censorship, and that restoring the exemption for newspapers and broadcasters from having to seek pre-publication approval for material including violence or sexual content does not remedy the situation.
Other amendments duplicate existing provisions in other laws, such as the Equality Act; place the adjudication of freedom of expression issues before an administrative tribunal staffed with bureaucrats, rather than the courts; or encroach on the authority of the Independent Communications Authority of SA.
Acrimonious hearings
The walkout follows acrimonious hearings earlier this month, during which the media decried the Bill for seeking to introduce a censorship regime “not even the apartheid government dared to enforce”.
Among the parties making submissions were the Internet Service Providers Association, the Wireless Application Service Providers Association and the National Association of Broadcasters.
Swart, at the time, said the Bill “as far as I am concerned, is fraught with difficulty and is unconstitutional in many respects”. He added that the objectives of the Bill, to clamp down on visual images of child abuse and to keep porn out of the hands of children, are laudable, “but we are going about it the wrong way”. Swart said self-regulation remained preferable.
Freedom of Expression Institute spokesman Naeem Jeenah says he regrets the DA's walkout. “This is an important battle that needs to be fought at the level of the Parliamentary Committee and it is a pity the DA withdrew. That leaves it to civil society to convince the rest of the committee that the Bill is unconstitutional.
“For us, the lobbying around the Bill continues,” Jeenah says. “We will continue to lobby Parliament not to enact the Bill. If they do, we will lobby the president [Thabo Mbeki] not to sign it into law. If he signs, we – with other organisations – will lead a constitutional challenge against it. We hope it won't come to that.”
Related stories:
Global online censorship rising fast
Censorship Bill back to drafters?
Media cries foul at proposed Bill
China to rein in bloggers
Experts find path round Internet firewalls
Big Brother laws threaten World Cup
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
When
the economy is down, business begins not only cutting costs, but
gearing up or changing services, says HP's David Cannon. This
comprehensive two-day event promises to bring together experts from
all over the world providing solutions to your most pressing
business challenges.
|
Copyright (c) 1996 - 2012 ITWeb Limited. All rights reserved. Would you like to see your news here? Contact us for more details at itnews@itweb.co.za |
|||||||||||
|
